A LESS-CONSTRAINED (2,0) SUPER-YANG-MILLS MODEL THE COUPLING TO NON-LINEAR σ-MODELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v20i.9134Keywords:
Extended gauge theories, Sigma modelsAbstract
Considering a class of (2,0) super-Yang-Mills multiplets characterised by the appearance of a pair of independent gauge potentials, we present here their coupling to non-linear σ-models in (2,0)-superspace. Contrary to the case of the coupling to (2,0) matter superfields, the extra gauge potential present in the Yang-Mills sector does not decouple from the theory in the case one gauges isometry groups of σ-models.Considering a class of (2,0) super-Yang-Mills multiplets characterized by the appearance of a pair of independent gauge potentials, we present here their coupling to non-linear σ-models in (2,0)-superspace. Contrary to the case of the coupling to
(2,0) matter superfields, the extra gauge potential present in the Yang-Mills sector does not decouple from the theory in the case one gauges isometry groups of σ-models.
Downloads
References
C. A. S. Almeida, J. A. Helayël-Neto and A. William Smith, ”Gauging σ-Model Isometries in (2,0)-
Superspace”, CBPF preprint NF-014/90, and Universidade Católica de Petrópolis preprint, UCP-HEP-90/3,
submitted for publication.
C. A. S. Almeida and R. M. Doria, ”Information on the Gauge Principle from a (2,0)-Supersymmetric Gauge
Model”, Universidade Católica de Petrópolis preprint, UCP-HEP-89/1, submitted for publication.
C. M. Hull and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)90008-5
C. M. Hull, A. Karlhede, U. Lindström and M. Roček, Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986) 1.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90175-6
D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinoc and R. Rohm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.502
J. Bagger and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 118B (1982) 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90609-8
M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. 180B (1980) 364.
M. Sakamoto, Phys. Lett. B151 (1985) 115.
M. Porrati and E. T. Tomboulis, Nucl. Phys. B315 (1989) 615; https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(89)90005- 9
J. Quackenbush, Phys. Lett. B234 (1990) 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91928-5
N. Chair, J. A. Helayël-Neto and A. William Smith, Phys. Lett. 233B (1989) 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)90636-9
P. Candelas, G. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 46;
https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90602-9 C. M. Hull, Nucl. Phys. B260 (1985) 182 and Nucl. Phys. B267 (1986) 266;
A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) and Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1846. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1846
R. Brooks, F. Muhammad and S. J. Gates Jr., Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-
(86)90261-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 C.A.S. ALMEIDA ALMEIDA, J. Chauca, R.M. Doria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Journal of Advances in Linguistics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
