# Visualization In Mathematics Teaching

## DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/jam.v20i.9136## Keywords:

constructive thinking, visualization and representation, mathematics teaching, educational software## Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased use of information and communication technologies and mathematical software in mathematics teaching. Numerous studies of the effectiveness of mathematical learning have shown the justification and usefulness of the implementation of new teaching aids. They also showed that learning with educational software has a great impact on students' achievement in the overall acquisition of mathematical knowledge during the school year as well as in the final exam at the end of primary education. Teaching realized by using computers and software packages is interesting for students, increases their interest and active participation. It is indisputable that the use of computers and mathematical software has great benefits that have been proven and presented in their works by many researchers of effective learning. It is also indisputable that one of the main tasks of teaching mathematics is to develop constructive thinking of students. Visualization and representation of mathematical laws are of great importance in the realization of mathematics teaching. They should be applied everywhere and whenever possible.

### Downloads

## References

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 61(1), 103-131.

Knuth, E. J. (2000). Student understanding of the Cartesian connection: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 500-507.

Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.

Lopez Jr, A. M. (2001). A classroom notes on: Making connections through geometric visualization. Mathematics and Computer Education, 35(2), 116.

Hitt, F. (2002). Representations and mathematics visualization. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Mexico City: Cinvestav-IPN.

C. Alsina, R. B. Nelsen, Math Made Visual - Creating Images for Understanding Mathematics, The Mathematical Association of America, 2006.

Takachi, Ђ. and Samardzijevic, M. (2006). Visual approach to the definition of a function derivative. Teaching Mathematics, LI (1-2), 19-28.

Takachi, Ђ. and Radovanovic, J. (2009). On the visualization of the derivative function. Pedagogical Reality LV (9–10), 1000-1006.

Aspinwall, L., Shaw, K. L., & Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Uncontrollable mental imagery: Graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 301-317.

Baker, B., Cooley, L., & Trigueros, M. (2000). A calculus graphing schema. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 557-578.

Sedig, K., & Sumner, M. (2006). Characterizing interaction with visual mathematical representations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1), 1-55.

Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan G., & Houang R. (1989). The Role of Visualization in the Middle School Mathematics Curriculum. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11 (1), 49-60.

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 52(3), 215-241.

Gardner, M. (1973). “Look-see” diagrams that offer visual proof of complex algebraic formulas. Mathematical Games column in Scientific American, October 1973, 114-118.

Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math. Science, 320, 454–455.

Moreno, R., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: Effects on students' problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 32.

Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (1991). Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

McLeod, D. (1988). Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 134-141.

Fuys, D., Geddes, D., Tischler, R. (1988). The Van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph, 3.

De Villiers, M. (1998). An Alternative Approach to Proof in Dynamic Geometry. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space (pp. 369-393). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldenberg, E., Cuoco, A. (1998). What is Dynamic Geometry? In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space (pp. 351-367).

## Downloads

## Published

## How to Cite

*JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS*,

*20*, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.24297/jam.v20i.9136

## Issue

## Section

## License

Copyright (c) 2021 Shivkant Tiwari, Dragan Obradovic, Laxmi Rathour, Lakshmi Narayan Mishra, Vishnu Narayan Mishra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All articles published in *Journal of Advances in Linguistics* are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.